<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: C# – Check if connected to internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.farooqazam.net/csharp-check-if-connected-to-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.farooqazam.net/csharp-check-if-connected-to-internet/</link>
	<description>Unity 3D, Game Development and C# Programming.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:14:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jagadeesan Durairaj</title>
		<link>http://www.farooqazam.net/csharp-check-if-connected-to-internet/#comment-34030</link>
		<dc:creator>Jagadeesan Durairaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farooqazam.net/?p=274#comment-34030</guid>
		<description>Sorry not farooq, Nido.... Nido&#039;s code is correct and accurate whereas farooq&#039;s code is defective...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry not farooq, Nido&#8230;. Nido&#8217;s code is correct and accurate whereas farooq&#8217;s code is defective&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jagadeesan Durairaj</title>
		<link>http://www.farooqazam.net/csharp-check-if-connected-to-internet/#comment-34029</link>
		<dc:creator>Jagadeesan Durairaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farooqazam.net/?p=274#comment-34029</guid>
		<description>I think farooq&#039;s method is easy and accurate, because that code doesnt get the accurate result. It says connected to internet even if im not connected to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think farooq&#8217;s method is easy and accurate, because that code doesnt get the accurate result. It says connected to internet even if im not connected to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nido</title>
		<link>http://www.farooqazam.net/csharp-check-if-connected-to-internet/#comment-28957</link>
		<dc:creator>nido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 12:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farooqazam.net/?p=274#comment-28957</guid>
		<description>Farooq at the starting I was using the same technique as you describe in your post.
I am sharing a simple line which will give you 100% correct out put is you connect to net or not.
public static bool NetStatus()
        {
           return System.Net.NetworkInformation.NetworkInterface.GetIsNetworkAvailable();
        }
it is just one line function and it working great, I also like your post. Good work and keep posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Farooq at the starting I was using the same technique as you describe in your post.<br />
I am sharing a simple line which will give you 100% correct out put is you connect to net or not.<br />
public static bool NetStatus()<br />
        {<br />
           return System.Net.NetworkInformation.NetworkInterface.GetIsNetworkAvailable();<br />
        }<br />
it is just one line function and it working great, I also like your post. Good work and keep posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.farooqazam.net/csharp-check-if-connected-to-internet/#comment-5733</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 14:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farooqazam.net/?p=274#comment-5733</guid>
		<description>I was using webrequest/webresponse to check the internet connection but.. this way is much better, it is exactly what i was looking for.
Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was using webrequest/webresponse to check the internet connection but.. this way is much better, it is exactly what i was looking for.<br />
Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

